Dear readers, The Paris Agreement forms a welcome step in the direction of the acceptance that we all need to act against climate change. An inside view of the agreement will follow at the start of 2016. Our third Summer Programme on International and European Environmental Law: Making it Work will take place in The Hague between 29 August and 2 September 2016. This last News Service of the year incorporates a wealth of annotated case law, notably on various aspects of EIA (cases from the ICJ, CJEU and the Irish High Court), on dolphin-safe labelling of tuna (WTO) and on a a Peruvian farmer claiming compensation from German energy provider RWE for its 0.5% share in global greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, it brings you news on issues like the re-issued circular economy package, contradictory opinions on the weedkiller ‘Roundup’ and EP’s tough stance on car emission tests. We hope you enjoy the read and wish you a merry X-mas, happy holidays and a good 2016. Wybe Douma |
|
CJEU Judgments |
CJEU Judgment: Case C-137/14 European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (15/10/2015) This case dealt with the compatibility of provisions of German national law with Article 11 Environmental Impact Assessment Directive 2011/92 (EIA) and Article 25 Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75 (IED). The Court held, first of all, that Member States may allow the courts to make the annulment of an administrative act contingent upon finding that the claimants’ public-law right had been infringed. Member States can impose this condition because Member States are also, by virtue of the first paragraph of the EIA and IED provisions mentioned above, permitted to make access to a court procedure contingent on a similar condition, i.e. that the claimants maintain the impairment of a right. Secondly, a German national provision that grants access to courts only Thirdly, a German provision requiring that the annulment of an administrative decision is subject to there being a causal link between the alleged procedural defect and the substantive outcome of the administrative decision in question, so that the defect can be shown to have affected the merits of that decision, is not allowed. It is contrary to the very nature of Article 11 EIA Directive, which emphasises the importance of the procedural rights therein in their own right, and has the effect of rendering that provision totally ineffective. Shifting the burden on the applicant to show a causal link between the procedural defect and the outcome of the decision in order to establish an impairment of a right makes the exercise of that right excessively difficult, in particular having regard to the complexity of the procedures in question and the technical nature of EIA’s. Fourthly, Article 11(4) EIA Directive and Article 25(4) IED do not allow restrictions on the pleas in law that may be raised during the administrative procedure. Member States may only lay down some restrictions, e.g. on arguments submitted abusively or in bad faith, for example. Finally, the ‘infringement of an individual public-law right’ requirement cannot be applied to environmental protection organisations (Article 11(3) EIA Directive and Article 25(3) IED). They must, instead, be able to rely on the rules of national law implementing EU environmental law and the rules of EU environmental law that have direct effect. |
CJEU Judgment: Case C‑198/14 Visnapuu (‘Estonian bottles’) (12/11/2015) An Estonian company, controlled by Mr Visnapuu, maintained a website through which Finns could purchase alcoholic beverages and have them delivered to their homes. Finnish legislation imposes an excise duty on certain beverage packaging while exempting packaging that is part of a functioning return system. Mr. Visnapuu objected to the duty and the case ended up with the CJEU. The court held that the excise duty amounted to internal taxation within the meaning of Article 110 TFEU. As it was neither directly nor indirectly discriminatory, it was compatible with the TFEU provision, and with Articles 1(1), 7 and 15 Directive 94/62 on packaging and packaging waste. The CJEU noted that small e-commerce traders in Finland and other Member States would encounter the same difficulties in accessing functioning return systems as Mr. Visnapuu’s company. The CJEU also held that the retail sale licence condition, which sellers must obtain in order to be able to import alcohol and which requires an authorised premise, is a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction within the meaning of Article 34 TFEU because traders established in other Member States are prevented from importing alcohol freely into Finland with a view to their retail sale. The CJEU accepted the applicability of the human health and life public policy derogation under Article 36 TFEU, but asked the Finnish court to undertake a proportionality analysis in order to assess whether any less restrictive measures could achieve the same objective, while taking into account the fact that the Finnish state monopoly was also permitted to send alcohol by mail order. Finally, the CJEU held that the Finnish court would have to evaluate whether the exception, under Finnish law, for manufacturers that sell their own alcohol, is justifiable, taking into account the limited, traditional and artisanal nature of the national production protected by the measure. |
CJEU Judgment: Case T-521/14 Sweden v European Commission, establishing scientific criteria on endocrine- disrupting properties of active substances in biocides (Judgment in French/Swedish) (16/12/2015) The Commission had argued inter alia that is first needed to conduct an impact assessment in order to assess the implications of the different alternatives to the potential criteria and their implementation in the sectoral laws. In this respect, the Court noted in para 74 of its judgment that the Biocides Regulation does not require such an impact assessment, and that even if such an assessment should be made, the legally binding date by which criteria were to be adopted – namely by 13 December 2013 at the latest – was to be respected. In the light of these considerations, the reaction of the Commission to the judgment is remarkable.[1] A representative of the institution said they ‘took note of the judgment’, and reiterated that any decision had to be based on solid scientific ground, and that endocrine disruptors are a highly complex issue. Hence, the amount and type of work needed to formulate criteria is challenging and pioneer work at a global level, has not been done before by anyone, and is taking more time than expected. At the same time it was stressed that the impact assessment was ‘on track’ and will be concluded in the course of 2016. The actual decision identifying criteria for endocrine disruptors will follow ‘as soon as possible’ afterwards. The Commission thus seems to be disregarding the judgement of the General Court, and in that way also art. 266 TFEU: ‘The institution … whose failure to act has been declared contrary to the Treaties shall be required to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union.’ |
CJEU Initiated Proceedings November 2015 |
European Commission Press Release: Commission proposes a fine and refers Romania to the CJEU over failure to transpose EU rules on sulphur(19/11/2015) |
European Commission Press Release: Commission proposes fines and refers Greece back to the CJEU over persistent poor waste water treatment(19/11/2015) |
European Commission Press Release: Commission refers Greece to Court for failing to comply with obligations under the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (19/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Brussels gets tough on energy efficiency (19/11/2015) |
CJEU initiated proceedings December 2015 |
European Commission Press Release: Commission refers Poland to the Court of Justice of the EU over poor air quality (10/12/2015) |
European Commission Press Release: Waste management: Commission refers Greece to the Court of Justice of the EU over illegal landfill (10/12/2015) |
European Commission Press Release: December infringements’ package: key decisions (10/12/2015) ▪ Spain to step up efforts to comply with EU law to counter the trade in illegally harvested timber, namely the EU Timber Regulation (EUTR; Regulation (EU) No 995/2010), which prohibits the placing of illegally harvested timber on the European market, and the Enforcement Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Regulation of the Forest Law (Council Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005), which establishes a licensing scheme to verify the legality of imports of timber into the EU from countries that have partnership agreements under the scheme. If Spain fails to act within two months, the Commission may refer this case to the CJEU. |
International Judgments |
WTO Case: US – measures concerning the importation, marketing and sale of tuna and tuna products, WT/DS381/AB/RW (03/12/2015) |
ICJ Judgments: Certain Activities carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v Nicaragua) & Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v Costa Rica) (16/12/2015) The two cases concern activities aimed at deepening the San Juan river at the border between the two parties, initiated by Nicaragua in October 2010, and the subsequent construction of a road along that river in Costa Rica. The latter country claimed that Nicargua’s activities were causing significant harm to its environment, including a wetland protected under the Ramsar Convention. Nicaragua claimed that the road was causing significant harm to its territory. Both parties claimed the other state had violated international environmental law by not conducting an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) before starting its activities. The ICJ found that the deepening of the river did not bring about a risk of serious damage to the other parties’ environment, but the same was not true where the road construction was concerned because of its length and its crossing through and passing by wetland areas. Compared to the 2010 Paper Mills Case, it is remarkable that the duty to carry out an EIA – described as ‘an obligation under general international law’ was extended to all activities that carry the risk of significant transboundary harm, and not merely industrial activities. As for the duty to notify and consult about the planned road construction, it was merely set out that this “does not call for examination … in the present case”. Nevertheless, the judgment stresses that Costa Rica has accepted the obligation to prepare an appropriate EIA for any further works on the road, should they carry a risk of significant transboundary harm. In such a case, Costa Rica will have to consult in good faith with Nicaragua to determine the appropriate measures to prevent significant transboundary harm or minimize the risk thereof. |
Domestic Proceedings |
Irish High Court: An Taisce v An Bord Pleanála [2015] IEHC 633 (10/09/2015) An Taisce, an environmental NGO, challenged the approval granted by Ireland’s planning board An Bord Pleanála for the continued operation of a peat- and biomass-fired power plant. The NGO claimed that the environmental effects of extracting the peat fuel source and transporting it to the thermal power plant formed environmental effects of the plant that needed to be taken into account in accordance with the Irish law that implements the EIA Directive 2011/92. The authorities only found the site of the power plant relevant to the planning permission, adding that fuel could come from a variety of other entities and locations than the designated peat bogs. Moreover, An Bord Pleanála argued that because the Environmental Protection Agency had licensed the peat extraction, refusing the planning permission ‘would not and could not require the cessation of peat extraction of the bogs’. The High Court concluded that there is functional interdependence as the power plant relies for the vast majority of its raw material on the designated bogs, which is not brought into question by the fact that the power plant could in theory operate without this peat. Moreover, it held that An Bord Pleanála had interpreted Section 171A Planning and Development Act 2000 (corresponding to art. 3 EIA Directive) too narrowly. Extracting peat from the bog may cause environmental effects, the Court found, and these indirect effects should be included in a proper EIA before granting planning permission for the power plant, because otherwise the effectiveness of the EIA Directive would not be properly ensured. |
Colombia Law School Climate Law Blog: Irish High Court: Peat-Fired Power Plant’s Environmental Review Must Account for Impacts of Peat Extraction (02/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Peruvian farmer takes on German energy giant(25/11/2015) |
|
EurActiv Special Report: Commission seeks solutions to ‘confusing’ Green labelled products (19/11/2015) |
Education2016/7 Master of Laws (LL.M.) in Energy, Environmental and Climate Change Law |
|
European Environment Agency Press Release: Many Europeans still exposed to harmful air pollution (30/11/2015) |
|
EurActiv Article: EU says cancer risk from popular weedkiller ‘unlikely’(12/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: EU scientists advise higher safety limits on glyphosate weedkiller (13/11/2015) |
European Parliament Press Release: Don’t allow recycling of plastics that contain toxic phthalate DEHP, warn MEPs (25/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: MEPs block Commission proposal to recycle hormone disrupting plastics (30/11/2015) |
EurActiv Opinion: EU chemicals law needs tightening to protect people and nature (08/12/2015) |
|
UN Climate Conference COP21 |
European Commission Factsheet: What does the EU do for Climate? |
European Commission Climate Action: Historic climate deal in Paris: EU leads global efforts (12/12/2015) |
EurActiv Infographic: The COP21 decisions at a glance (17/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Civil society could force governments to stick to their climate commitments (24/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Regions push for ‘bottom-up’ approach to climate change mitigation (26/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: EIB boss: Cities and regions have crucial role in ensuring climate investment (27/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: The ‘4 per 1,000’ initiative brings climate action and agriculture together (30/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Early hopes for carbon markets dashed as COP21 opens (30/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Dependence on coal jeopardises climate targets (03/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: COP21: Indian officials accuse OECD of exaggerating climate aid (04/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Paris pushes other cities to bolster Green Climate Fund (07/12/2015) |
EurActiv Special Report: Future carbon market: The Far East (08/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Energy utilities push carbon pricing, lobby against renewable targets at COP21 (09/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: How the emerging economies are stealing the show at COP21 (10/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: The good and bad surprises of the INDCs (11/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: COP21 celebrations, but governments must mind the emissions gap (12/12/2015) |
Other Climate News |
European Commission Climate Action: Commission welcomes strong EU commitment to boost climate assistance for developing countries (10/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: French Senate highlights the role of local authorities in fighting climate change (12/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: German 2020 climate targets in danger (20/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: 700 cities promise renewable energy transition by 2050(07/12/2015) |
European Parliament Press Release: Parliament is first EU institution to become 100 % carbon neutral (13/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Food giants shoot for 100% renewable energy target(18/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Bristol pledge to become carbon neutral by 2050 (16/12/2015) |
European Commission Climate Action: EU meets Kyoto targets under first commitment period (2008-2012) (18/11/2015) |
European Commission Climate Action: European Commission launches online course on Emissions Trading Systems (24/11/2015) |
European Commission Press Release: Commission co-finances under LIFE programme projects supporting the environment, nature and a more sustainable economy (20/11/2015) |
European Commission Climate Action: Commission awards 26 action grants in first year of LIFE Climate Action projects (25/11/2015) |
|
European Parliament Press Release: MEPs want integrated energy market with clear targets & secure supplies (10/11/2015) |
European Commission Climate Action: The Energy Union on track to deliver (18/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Commission outlines Energy Union legislative path(18/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Commission ‘pre-emptive strike’ puts cap on EU energy efficiency targets (18/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Fossil fuel subsidies reach $452bn a year, study says(12/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Rich powers cut export aid for coal plants (18/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: OECD agrees deal to restrict financing for coal technology(18/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Developed countries agree to cut coal subsidies in 2017(19/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Coal-fired power plants: EU endorses new OECD rules on export credits (26/11/2015) |
European Commission Press Release: Closing the loop: Commission adopts new Circular Economy Package (02/12/2015) Key actions adopted today or to be carried out under the current Commission’s mandate include (Commission Communication/Fact Sheet): |
European Commission Press Release: Circular Economy Package: Questions & Answers (02/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: The Circular Economy Package: A waste of job opportunities? (04/12/2015) |
Foxgloves- towards a sustainable Europe blog entry: Circular economy package out – is it what we were hoping for? (09/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Two thirds of European oil refineries ready for tar sands imports (25/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: UK cancels pioneering carbon capture and storage competition (26/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: French and German companies pledge massive coal divestment (26/11/2015) |
European Commission Climate Action: F-gas Report 2014: Gearing up for the new F-gas Regulation (09/12/2015) |
|
European Commission Fact Sheet: Questions and Answers: New Regulation on Novel Food (16/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: EU unblocks novel foods entry into European market (18/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Food sector looks beyond factory gates for deep CO2 cuts(16/11/2015) |
EurActiv Special Report: Food industry focuses on sustainable sourcing to mitigate climate change (20/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Commission hopes new CAP grants will boost number of young farmers (30/11/2015) |
European Parliament Press Release: Environment MEPs oppose new GM maize authorization (01/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Animal diseases on the rise due to climate change, warns industry (08/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: EU opens investigation into biofuel benchmark fixing (07/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: EU aims to crack down on unsustainable palm oil and illegal logging (09/12/2015) |
European Parliament Press Release: Plant health: deal on new measures to tackle influx of new pests into the EU (17/12/2015) |
European Parliament Press Release: Safeguard farmers’ traditional plant breeding rights, say MEPs (17/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: EU moves step closer to ban on deep-sea trawler fishing(12/11/2015) |
European Commission Fisheries: EU fishing fleet annual report: better balance between fishing capacity and fishing opportunities (16/11/2015) |
European Commission Press Release: Commission proposes new rules to improve transparency and monitoring of EU fleet fishing internationally(10/12/2015) |
European Commission Fisheries: EU and Mauritania sign a new 4-year Sustainable Fisheries Protocol (17/11/2015) |
European Commission Fisheries: Important decisions by ICCAT for better fisheries management of tunas (18/11/2015) |
European Commission Fisheries: Latest EFF report shows Member States spending more on sustainable fisheries (17/12/2015) |
|
Council of the EU Press Release: Real driving emissions: Council gives green light to first package (10/11/2015) |
Council of the EU Press Release: Emission reductions from road vehicles: negotiations continue on a review of the legislation (19/11/2015) |
European Parliament Press Release: Environment MEPs oppose relaxing diesel car emission test limits (14/12/2015) EurActiv Article: Environment MEPs rebuff member states on diesel emissions (15/12/2015) |
European Parliament Press Release: “Dieselgate”: Parliament sets up inquiry committee (17/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: MEPs demand Commission propose tolls on trucks to curb CO2 emissions (20/11/2015) |
European Commission Climate Action: CO2 emissions from new cars and vans continue to decrease (26/11/2015) |
European Commission Mobility and Transport: Public Consultation: Ex-post evaluation of EU financial support to sustainable urban mobility and to the use of alternative fuels in EU urban areas (27/11/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Germany pioneers development of cleantech (09/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Commission takes Germany to court over Daimler refrigerant (10/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: Alpine region vexed by traffic sees light at end of tunnel (15/12/2015) |
EurActiv Article: ‘Significant behaviour shifts’ needed to cut transport emissions (17/12/2015) |
|
EurActiv Article: Damage to oceans could be irreparable and deadly(07/12/2015) |
|
29 August- 2 September 2016Event: Summer Programme on International and European Environmental Law More Information to follow |
Editors-in-ChiefWybe Th. Douma (Senior Researcher, T.M.C. Asser Instituut and Lecturer of Leonardo Massai (Senior Lecturer on International and EU Environmental Law, Catholic University of Lille) EditorsKatarina Hovden (T.M.C. Asser Instituut, The Hague) Steffen van der Velde (Researcher, T.M.C. Asser Instituut, The Hague) |